Makes the case for the rediscovery of British philosopher Gillian Rose’s unique but neglected voice Kate Schick explains the core themes of Gillian Rose's work. She engages with the work of Benjamin, Honig, Zizek and Butler and locates Rose's ideas within central debates in contemporary social theory: trauma and memory, exclusion and difference, tragedy and messianic utopia. She shows how Rose’s speculative perspective brings a different gaze to bear on debates, avoiding well-worn liberal, critical theoretic and post-structural positions. Gillian Rose draws on idiosyncratic readings of thinkers such as Hegel, Adorno and Kierkegaard to underpin her philosophy, refusing to privilege the particular over the universal. While of the left, she is sharply critical of much left-wing thought, insisting that it shirks the work of coming to know and taking political risk in the hope that we might find a ‘good enough justice’.

"What Schick achieves in 130 pages is impressive. She offers an exposition of Rose’s thought, grounds it in its formative philosophical influences and sets it in conversation with problems in contemporary political philosophy. And she does this cogently, without significantly sacrificing breadth or depth ... Schick’s work is a compelling invitation to read more Gillian Rose." - LSE Review of Books

"Schick’s account is an engaging presentation of Rose’s thought addressed to readers new to her work ... Gillian Rose: A Good Enough Justice provides evidence of the singular power of attraction of Rose’s thought in its capacity to think through the dualisms conditioning social-political actuality and to afford resources for ethical action." - Radical Philosophy

"For a multifaceted engagement with Rose’s ideas which goes beyond the concept of impiety... Schick’s Gillian Rose is the book to turn to. Rose’s demanding oeuvre has suffered from an undue neglect which Schick’s refined book will hopefully go some way to remedying. Gillian Rose provides a clear and persuasive argument for Rose’s continuing relevance in relation to debates about trauma and how to respond to it." - The Year’s Work in Critical and Cultural Theory