This is an automatically translated description

The medical intervention required for surrogacy is tantamount to abandonment. As is traditionally the case in obstetrics, the interests of mother and child are in conflict.

These children, who are the subject of real contracts, are themselves virtual children, because they are not subjects but objects of contracts. Knowledge based on science and psychoanalysis should be given precedence.

Given current approaches, we cannot view the issues of child abandonment, adoption, surrogacy and medical procreation through the prism of feelings alone.

The issue of kinship is not just a mechanical story of mother-child interaction. It has an impact on both the family and society as a whole, thanks to the transformation of family laws that result from it. The denial of all these elements relating to antenatal life and bonding gives rise to this highly controversial practice and ignores those who are its objects: both mothers and children.
Love is put forward as an argument to justify these practices. It is certainly desirable, but the conditions for having children cannot be reduced to love alone. Furthermore, it may seem that any reflection on topics that might complicate the question of kinship is already pre-determined by the cultural weight of the fact that we all come from a civilisation based on considerations of descent and its connection to the prohibition of incest, which is already written into law as much as it is unconscious. Its violation is never without consequences.